MODL vs VOO
VictoryShares WestEnd US Sector ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, MODL or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. MODL is less concentrated, with 34.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MODL | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.66% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 363 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +10.73% | +12.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.98% | +17.03%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.31% | +21.25%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.08% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4%Best | 13.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.6%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $21,648 | $22,391Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.1%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 11, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 12, 2022 to Sep 17, 2026 (3.9 years).
MODL vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
MODL vs VOO Performance
VictoryShares WestEnd US Sector ETF (MODL) is an ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MODL returned +14.98% while VOO returned +17.03%. Year to date, MODL is up 10.73% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, MODL compounded at +20.31% per year against +21.25% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +22.96% annualized vs +21.90%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.0% compared with 12.4% for MODL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.6% for MODL and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MODL charges 0.46% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MODL currently yields 0.66% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
94.5% of MODL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 80.8% of VOO's money is in holdings MODL also owns.
Most of MODL is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
296 positions in common, counted across the 361 positions we hold weights for in MODL and 494 in VOO, against full books of 363 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 195 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for MODL (18.5% of the fund), and 56 for MODL that do not appear in VOO (3.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MODL | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.41% | 7.55% | 1.14% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.02% | 7.05% | 1.03% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.62% | 5.36% | 0.74% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.08% | 3.24% | 0.16% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.05% | 4.13% | 2.08% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.66% | 2.62% | 0.04% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.21% | 2.86% | 0.65% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.98% | 1.90% | 0.08% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.29% | 1.46% | 0.83% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.09% | 1.41% | 0.68% |
94.5% of MODL is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MODL or VOO?
MODL has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MODL or VOO?
Over the past year MODL returned +14.98% vs +17.03% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), MODL annualized +21.90% vs +22.96% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MODL or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 13.0% annualized versus 12.4% for MODL. Worst drawdown: MODL -17.6% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both MODL and VOO?
MODL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MODL and VOO?
94.5% of MODL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 80.8% of VOO's is in holdings MODL also owns. They hold 296 positions in common, counted across the 361 positions we hold weights for in MODL and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, MODL or VOO?
MODL yields 0.66% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than MODL?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. MODL is less concentrated, with 34.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.