PFDE vs VOO
Pathfinder Disciplined US Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, PFDE or VOO?
VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PFDE | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $164M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 86 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +15.31%Best | +14.14% |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.85% |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.6% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Pathfinder ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PFDE vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PFDE vs VOO Performance
Pathfinder Disciplined US Equity ETF (PFDE) is an ETF from Pathfinder ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PFDE is up 15.31% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PFDE charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PFDE currently yields 0.18% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
99.3% of PFDE's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 55.4% of VOO's money is in holdings PFDE also owns.
Most of PFDE is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
86 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in PFDE and 494 in VOO, against full books of 86 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 88 and 494 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 401 positions PFDE does not, 43.8% of the fund.
Largest: META 1.90%, BRK.B 1.46%, XOM 1.00%, V 0.93%, WMT 0.76%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PFDE | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.18% | 7.55% | 2.63% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.25% | 7.05% | 0.80% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.04% | 5.36% | 0.32% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.31% | 4.13% | 1.18% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.54% | 2.86% | 0.68% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 3.24% | 0.24% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.25% | 2.62% | 0.37% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.13% | 1.44% | 1.69% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.36% | 0.96% | 1.40% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.50% | 0.72% | 1.78% |
99.3% of PFDE is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PFDE or VOO?
PFDE has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PFDE and VOO?
99.3% of PFDE's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 55.4% of VOO's is in holdings PFDE also owns. They hold 86 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in PFDE and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, PFDE or VOO?
PFDE yields 0.18% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than PFDE?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.