PJFV vs VTI
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PJFV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PJFV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $154M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 36 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.76% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.91% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.94% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
PJFV vs VTI Performance
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) is a ETF from PGIM Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PJFV returned +31.91% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, PJFV is up 19.76% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, PJFV compounded at +24.94% per year against +21.54% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, PJFV has the edge at +21.78% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.9% for PJFV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.1% for PJFV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PJFV charges 0.33% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $3 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PJFV currently yields 0.57% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PJFV and VTI share 29 holdings out of 2793 unique holdings combined, representing a 28.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PJFV or VTI?
PJFV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PJFV or VTI?
Over the past year PJFV returned +31.91% vs +21.39% for VTI, so PJFV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), PJFV annualized +21.78% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PJFV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.9% for PJFV. Worst drawdown: PJFV -18.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PJFV and VTI?
PJFV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PJFV and VTI?
PJFV and VTI share 29 common holdings with a 28.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2793 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PJFV or VTI?
PJFV yields 0.57% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.