PJFV vs VTI
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PJFV or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PJFV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PJFV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $147M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 39 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +19.64%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +27.80%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.88%Best | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 12.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.1%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.8 years | $20,790Best | $19,924 |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 14, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.8 years).
PJFV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.8 years both funds cover.
PJFV vs VTI Performance
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PJFV returned +27.80% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, PJFV is up 19.64% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, PJFV compounded at +23.88% per year against +21.01% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, PJFV has the edge at +21.24% annualized vs +19.89%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 11.8% for PJFV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.1% for PJFV and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PJFV charges 0.33% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $3 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PJFV currently yields 0.57% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
85.1% of PJFV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.6% of VTI's money is in holdings PJFV also owns.
Most of PJFV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
30 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PJFV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 39 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,120 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PJFV (66.8% of the fund), and 1 for PJFV that do not appear in VTI (3.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PJFV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.42% | 6.29% | 0.87% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.22% | 4.79% | 1.43% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.86% | 3.65% | 1.21% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.61% | 1.31% | 3.30% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.01% | 2.90% | 0.11% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 3.96% | 0.89% | 3.07% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.86% | 1.35% | 1.51% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 3.46% | 0.68% | 2.78% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.88% | 1.70% | 0.18% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.88% | 0.61% | 2.27% |
85.1% of PJFV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PJFV or VTI?
PJFV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PJFV or VTI?
Over the past year PJFV returned +27.80% vs +16.08% for VTI, so PJFV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), PJFV annualized +21.24% vs +19.89% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PJFV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 11.8% for PJFV. Worst drawdown: PJFV -18.1% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both PJFV and VTI?
PJFV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PJFV and VTI?
85.1% of PJFV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.6% of VTI's is in holdings PJFV also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PJFV and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, PJFV or VTI?
PJFV yields 0.57% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PJFV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PJFV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.