PJUS vs VOO

PJUS vs VOO

Which is better, PJUS or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.0%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPJUSVOO
Expense Ratio0.19%0.03%Best
AUM$7M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings97509
YTD Return+4.62%+12.37%Best
1Y Return-+16.61%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.37%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.49%
Top 10 Weight42.0%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyPGIM InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 20, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PJUS vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PJUS vs VOO Performance

PGIM Jennison U.S. Core Equity ETF (PJUS) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PJUS is up 4.62% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PJUS charges 0.19% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PJUS currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

PJUS already in VOO89.6%
VOO already in PJUS58.5%

89.6% of PJUS's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 58.5% of VOO's money is in holdings PJUS also owns.

Most of PJUS is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

78 positions in common, counted across the 97 positions we hold weights for in PJUS and 494 in VOO, against full books of 97 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 409 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for PJUS (40.7% of the fund), and 18 for PJUS that do not appear in VOO (9.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PJUSWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp7.38%7.55%0.17%
AAPLApple, Inc7.52%7.05%0.47%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.20%5.36%0.16%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A6.82%3.24%3.58%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.97%4.13%0.16%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.08%2.86%0.22%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.26%1.44%0.82%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.76%1.90%0.14%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.84%1.46%0.38%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.80%1.41%0.39%

89.6% of PJUS is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PJUSVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PJUS or VOO?

PJUS has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between PJUS and VOO?

89.6% of PJUS's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 58.5% of VOO's is in holdings PJUS also owns. They hold 78 positions in common, counted across the 97 positions we hold weights for in PJUS and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, PJUS or VOO?

PJUS yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than PJUS?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.