PTLC vs VOO
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, PTLC or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PTLC led over the full window, VOO over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PTLC | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3.3B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 506 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +6.93% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.42% | +17.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.46% | +21.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.60% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 72817.7% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.6%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,814 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.0% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2010 to Sep 11, 2026 (16 years).
PTLC vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PTLC vs VOO Performance
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PTLC returned +10.42% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, PTLC is up 6.93% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Over three years, PTLC compounded at +13.46% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.60% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, PTLC has the edge at +74.30% annualized vs +13.41%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PTLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 72817.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.6% for PTLC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.07. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PTLC charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PTLC currently yields 0.99% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
99.3% of PTLC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 99.2% of VOO's money is in holdings PTLC also owns.
Most of PTLC is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
491 positions in common, counted across the 500 positions we hold weights for in PTLC and 505 in VOO, against full books of 506 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 9 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for PTLC (0.3% of the fund), and 5 for PTLC that do not appear in VOO (0.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PTLC | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.71% | 7.51% | 0.20% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.83% | 6.59% | 0.24% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.50% | 4.30% | 1.20% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.08% | 3.62% | 0.46% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.33% | 3.25% | 0.08% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.97% | 2.77% | 0.20% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.67% | 2.59% | 0.08% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.94% | 1.92% | 0.02% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 2.02% | 0.51% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.38% | 1.84% | 0.46% |
99.3% of PTLC is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PTLC or VOO?
PTLC has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PTLC or VOO?
Over the past year PTLC returned +10.42% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PTLC annualized +74.30% vs +13.41% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PTLC or VOO?
PTLC has been the more volatile fund at 72817.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PTLC -26.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PTLC and VOO?
PTLC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.07, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PTLC and VOO?
99.3% of PTLC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 99.2% of VOO's is in holdings PTLC also owns. They hold 491 positions in common, counted across the 500 positions we hold weights for in PTLC and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, PTLC or VOO?
PTLC yields 0.99% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than PTLC?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PTLC led over the full window, VOO over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.