QIDX vs VOO
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QIDX or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. QIDX is less concentrated, with 24.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QIDX | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $39M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.87% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 133 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +7.06% | +12.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.05% | +18.60%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9%Best | 13.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $11,634 | $13,318Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 24.8%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Indexperts | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2025 to Sep 9, 2026 (1.7 years).
QIDX vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
QIDX vs VOO Performance
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) is an ETF from Indexperts and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QIDX returned +6.05% while VOO returned +18.60%. Year to date, QIDX is up 7.06% versus a gain of 12.23% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.0% compared with 9.9% for QIDX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for QIDX and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QIDX charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QIDX currently yields 0.87% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
66.5% of QIDX's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 30.5% of VOO's money is in holdings QIDX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, QIDX as of Aug 18, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
60 positions in common, counted across the 131 positions we hold weights for in QIDX and 505 in VOO, against full books of 133 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 436 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QIDX (68.9% of the fund), and 70 for QIDX that do not appear in VOO (32.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QIDX | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.17% | 6.59% | 4.42% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.11% | 3.25% | 0.14% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 0.62% | 4.30% | 3.68% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 4.08% | 0.27% | 3.81% |
| TMOThermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 2.82% | 0.29% | 2.53% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 2.15% | 0.88% | 1.27% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway B | 1.42% | 1.42% | 0.00% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.86% | 0.72% | 1.14% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.05% | 1.47% | 0.42% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.67% | 0.77% | 0.90% |
66.5% of QIDX is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QIDX or VOO?
QIDX has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QIDX or VOO?
Over the past year QIDX returned +6.05% vs +18.60% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QIDX annualized +9.31% vs +18.36% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QIDX or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 13.0% annualized versus 9.9% for QIDX. Worst drawdown: QIDX -15.0% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both QIDX and VOO?
QIDX and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QIDX and VOO?
66.5% of QIDX's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 30.5% of VOO's is in holdings QIDX also owns. They hold 60 positions in common, counted across the 131 positions we hold weights for in QIDX and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, QIDX or VOO?
QIDX yields 0.87% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QIDX?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. QIDX is less concentrated, with 24.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.