QQQ vs QRFT
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QRFT offers more diversification with 301 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | QRFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.25% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 301 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +11.77% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +19.32% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +10.94% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 17.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -30.2% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | QRAFT AI ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 20, 2019 |
QQQ vs QRFT Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap ETF (QRFT) is a ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while QRFT returned +21.39%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 11.77% for QRFT.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +19.32% for QRFT; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +10.94% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QRFT has the edge at +15.76% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.6% for QRFT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -30.2% for QRFT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while QRFT charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $75 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.25% for QRFT.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and QRFT share 55 holdings out of 340 unique holdings combined, representing a 51.6% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or QRFT?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while QRFT charges 0.75%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or QRFT?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +21.39% for QRFT, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +15.76% for QRFT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or QRFT?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.6% for QRFT. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs QRFT -30.2%.
Should I hold both QQQ and QRFT?
QQQ and QRFT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and QRFT?
QQQ and QRFT share 55 common holdings with a 51.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 340 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or QRFT?
QQQ yields 0.44% while QRFT yields 0.25%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.