QQQ vs ROE
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ROE delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | ROE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $262M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 1.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 102 | |
| YTD Return | +17.46% | +23.41% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.02% | +36.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.51% | +22.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.12% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -19.1% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Astoria Portfolio Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 1, 2023 |
QQQ vs ROE Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) is a ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.02% while ROE returned +36.75%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.46% versus a gain of 23.41% for ROE.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.51% per year against +22.75% for ROE. Across the full 3-year window we track, ROE has the edge at +21.76% annualized vs +13.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.5% for ROE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -19.1% for ROE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while ROE charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $49 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 1.00% for ROE.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and ROE share 30 holdings out of 174 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or ROE?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while ROE charges 0.49%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or ROE?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.02% vs +36.75% for ROE, so ROE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QQQ annualized +13.08% vs +21.76% for ROE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or ROE?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.5% for ROE. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs ROE -19.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and ROE?
QQQ and ROE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and ROE?
QQQ and ROE share 30 common holdings with a 25.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 174 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or ROE?
QQQ yields 0.41% while ROE yields 1.00%, so ROE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.