QQQ vs ROE
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
Which is better, QQQ or ROE?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 3Y and the full window, ROE over 1Y. ROE is less concentrated, with 13.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $281M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 107 | 102 |
| YTD Return | +17.21% | +20.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.10% | +27.50%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.27%Best | +23.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.60% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 14.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -19.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $18,941Best | $17,634 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 13.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Astoria Portfolio Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 1, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 1, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (3.1 years).
QQQ vs ROE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs ROE Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) is an ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.10% while ROE returned +27.50%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.21% versus a gain of 20.55% for ROE.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.27% per year against +23.05% for ROE.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 14.4% for ROE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -19.1% for ROE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while ROE charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $49 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.98% for ROE.
Holdings Overlap
64.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings ROE also owns. 28.8% of ROE's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 101 in ROE, against full books of 107 and 102.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 68 positions for ROE that do not appear in our book for QQQ (68.8% of the fund), and 66 for QQQ that do not appear in ROE (33.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in ROE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 1.09% | 7.35% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.27% | 1.12% | 6.15% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 1.39% | 4.37% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.67% | 1.11% | 3.56% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 0.76% | 3.67% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.36% | 0.97% | 2.39% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 0.93% | 2.23% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.78% | 1.01% | 1.77% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.56% | 0.95% | 1.61% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 2.41% | 0.88% | 1.53% |
64.2% of QQQ is already inside ROE.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or ROE?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while ROE charges 0.49%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or ROE?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.10% vs +27.50% for ROE, so ROE leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or ROE?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 14.4% for ROE. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs ROE -19.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and ROE?
QQQ and ROE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and ROE?
64.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings ROE also owns. 28.8% of ROE's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 101 in ROE.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or ROE?
QQQ yields 0.44% while ROE yields 0.98%, so ROE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ROE better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 3Y and the full window, ROE over 1Y. ROE is less concentrated, with 13.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.