QQQ vs TMFG
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TMFG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $360M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.26% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 46 | |
| YTD Return | +16.23% | +4.90% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.23% | +3.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.75% | +12.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.78% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 17.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -33.7% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Motley Fool Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 17, 2014 |
QQQ vs TMFG Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) is a ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% while TMFG returned +3.71%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.23% versus a gain of 4.90% for TMFG.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.75% per year against +12.75% for TMFG. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.3% for TMFG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -33.7% for TMFG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TMFG charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $85 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.26% for TMFG.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and TMFG share 8 holdings out of 134 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TMFG?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TMFG charges 0.85%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or TMFG?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% vs +3.71% for TMFG, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QQQ annualized +13.02% vs +4.01% for TMFG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or TMFG?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.3% for TMFG. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs TMFG -33.7%.
Should I hold both QQQ and TMFG?
QQQ and TMFG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TMFG?
QQQ and TMFG share 8 common holdings with a 11.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 134 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TMFG?
QQQ yields 0.44% while TMFG yields 0.26%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.