QQQ vs VUS

QQQ vs VUS

Which is better, QQQ or VUS?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. VUS is less concentrated, with 31.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: VUS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQVUS
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.25%
AUM$486.1B$18M
Dividend Yield0.44%1.29%
Holdings10795
YTD Return+17.44%+20.62%Best
1Y Return+24.69%-
3Y Return (annualized)+24.76%-
5Y Return (annualized)+14.22%-
Top 10 Weight46.5%31.7%Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Virtus Investment Partners
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Value
InceptionMar 10, 1999Dec 2, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs VUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs VUS Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Virtus US Dividend ETF (VUS) is an ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.44% versus a gain of 20.62% for VUS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while VUS charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $25 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.29% for VUS.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in VUS53.8%
VUS already in QQQ37.8%

53.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings VUS also owns. 37.8% of VUS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

18 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 94 in VUS, against full books of 107 and 95.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 69 positions for VUS that do not appear in our book for QQQ (56.8% of the fund), and 76 for QQQ that do not appear in VUS (43.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in VUSDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.8.44%5.73%2.71%
AAPLApple Inc Ord7.27%6.05%1.22%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 375.76%3.79%1.97%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.67%2.35%2.32%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.16%3.75%0.59%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.43%2.41%2.02%
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A3.36%1.73%1.63%
GOOGAlphabet, Inc., Class C3.13%1.14%1.99%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc2.10%1.75%0.35%
METAMeta Platform Inc 2.78%0.60%2.18%

53.8% of QQQ is already inside VUS.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQVUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or VUS?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VUS charges 0.25%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and VUS?

53.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings VUS also owns. 37.8% of VUS's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 94 in VUS.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or VUS?

QQQ yields 0.44% while VUS yields 1.29%, so VUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VUS better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. VUS is less concentrated, with 31.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.