QQQ vs WINN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WINN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.57% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $1.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 75 | |
| YTD Return | +16.19% | +7.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.22% | +11.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.47% | +22.33% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.34% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 21.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -32.1% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Harbor Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Feb 2, 2022 |
QQQ vs WINN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) is a ETF from Harbor Funds. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.22% while WINN returned +11.36%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.19% versus a gain of 7.80% for WINN.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.47% per year against +22.33% for WINN. Across the full 5-year window we track, WINN has the edge at +13.88% annualized vs +13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 21.1% for WINN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -32.1% for WINN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WINN charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $57 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for WINN.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and WINN share 35 holdings out of 141 unique holdings combined, representing a 53.8% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WINN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WINN charges 0.57%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or WINN?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.22% vs +11.36% for WINN, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QQQ annualized +13.01% vs +13.88% for WINN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WINN?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 21.1% for WINN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs WINN -32.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WINN?
QQQ and WINN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WINN?
QQQ and WINN share 35 common holdings with a 53.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 141 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WINN?
QQQ yields 0.44% while WINN yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.