QQQG vs XXQQ
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Subversive Growth 100 Redacted ETF
Which is better, QQQG or XXQQ?
XXQQ costs less.
XXQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQG is less concentrated, with 47.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQG | XXQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.30%Best |
| AUM | $49M | $864,529.7 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 104 | 98 |
| YTD Return | +14.42%Best | -8.83% |
| 1Y Return | +14.67% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.4%Best | 48.4% |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Subversive Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2024 | Oct 8, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQG vs XXQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQG vs XXQQ Performance
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Subversive Growth 100 Redacted ETF (XXQQ) is an ETF from Subversive Capital. Year to date, QQQG is up 14.42% versus a loss of 8.83% for XXQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQG charges 0.49% per year while XXQQ charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $30 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQG currently yields 0.07% against 0.00% for XXQQ.
Holdings Overlap
99.9% of QQQG's money is in holdings XXQQ also owns. 64.0% of XXQQ's money is in holdings QQQG also owns.
Most of QQQG is already inside XXQQ. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
50 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 98 in XXQQ, against full books of 104 and 98.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 43 positions for XXQQ that do not appear in our book for QQQG (33.4% of the fund), and 0 for QQQG that do not appear in XXQQ (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQG | Weight in XXQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple Inc | 1.76% | 8.45% | 6.69% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.24% | 4.33% | 0.91% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.14% | 8.40% | 7.26% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.69% | 4.77% | 0.08% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.33% | 6.65% | 5.32% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 5.53% | 0.85% | 4.68% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 5.37% | 0.88% | 4.49% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc. Class A | 5.32% | 0.40% | 4.92% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 5.00% | 0.47% | 4.53% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc. | 4.01% | 1.46% | 2.55% |
99.9% of QQQG is already inside XXQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQG or XXQQ?
QQQG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while XXQQ charges 0.30%. XXQQ is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQG and XXQQ?
99.9% of QQQG's money is in holdings XXQQ also owns. 64.0% of XXQQ's is in holdings QQQG also owns. They hold 50 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 98 in XXQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQG or XXQQ?
QQQG yields 0.07% while XXQQ yields 0.00%, so QQQG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XXQQ better than QQQG?
XXQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQG is less concentrated, with 47.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.