QRFT vs VOO
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QRFT or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QRFT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QRFT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 301 | 506 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 16.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -30.2%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 7.2 years | $28,683Best | $28,399 |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.5% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 73 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. QRFT has data through Jul 21, 2026 and VOO through Oct 2, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 7.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2019 to Jul 21, 2026 (7.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QRFT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 16.6% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.2% for QRFT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QRFT charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QRFT currently yields 0.25% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
96.0% of QRFT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 69.3% of VOO's money is in holdings QRFT also owns.
Most of QRFT is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 92 days apart, QRFT as of Apr 30, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
241 positions in common, counted across the 294 positions we hold weights for in QRFT and 494 in VOO, against full books of 301 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 245 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QRFT (29.9% of the fund), and 40 for QRFT that do not appear in VOO (1.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QRFT | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.65% | 7.55% | 2.10% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.21% | 7.05% | 2.16% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.92% | 4.13% | 1.79% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.70% | 3.24% | 1.46% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.11% | 2.86% | 1.25% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.76% | 1.90% | 0.86% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 3.26% | 1.36% | 1.90% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.00% | 1.41% | 0.59% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.72% | 1.44% | 0.28% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.69% | 1.46% | 0.23% |
96.0% of QRFT is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QRFT or VOO?
QRFT has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, QRFT or VOO?
QRFT has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 16.6% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QRFT -30.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QRFT and VOO?
QRFT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QRFT and VOO?
96.0% of QRFT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 69.3% of VOO's is in holdings QRFT also owns. They hold 241 positions in common, counted across the 294 positions we hold weights for in QRFT and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, QRFT or VOO?
QRFT yields 0.25% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QRFT?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QRFT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.