QRFT vs VOO
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QRFT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QRFT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 301 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.77% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.39% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.32% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.94% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QRFT vs VOO Performance
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap ETF (QRFT) is a ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QRFT returned +21.39% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, QRFT is up 11.77% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, QRFT compounded at +19.32% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.94% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QRFT has the edge at +15.76% annualized vs +13.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QRFT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.2% for QRFT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QRFT charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QRFT currently yields 0.25% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QRFT and VOO share 241 holdings out of 557 unique holdings combined, representing a 68.8% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QRFT or VOO?
QRFT has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QRFT or VOO?
Over the past year QRFT returned +21.39% vs +20.92% for VOO, so QRFT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), QRFT annualized +15.76% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QRFT or VOO?
QRFT has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QRFT -30.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QRFT and VOO?
QRFT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QRFT and VOO?
QRFT and VOO share 241 common holdings with a 68.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 557 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QRFT or VOO?
QRFT yields 0.25% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.