RA vs VTI
Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.36% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $769M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.16% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 598 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +4.94% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.92% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.85% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.46% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund, Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 2, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
RA vs VTI Performance
Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) is a ETF from Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund, Inc. and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RA returned +6.92% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, RA is up 4.94% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, RA compounded at +1.85% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.46% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +0.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.9% for RA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RA charges 2.36% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $236 vs $3 annually, a gap of $233 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RA currently yields 10.16% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RA and VTI share 56 holdings out of 2997 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RA or VTI?
RA has an expense ratio of 2.36% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $233 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RA or VTI?
Over the past year RA returned +6.92% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), RA annualized +0.73% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RA or VTI?
RA has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RA -54.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RA and VTI?
RA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RA and VTI?
RA and VTI share 56 common holdings with a 1.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2997 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RA or VTI?
RA yields 10.16% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.