RA vs VOO
Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.36% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $772M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.02% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 645 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +5.62% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.11% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.54% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.28% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund, Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 2, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RA vs VOO Performance
Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) is a ETF from Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund, Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RA returned +8.11% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, RA is up 5.62% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, RA compounded at +1.54% per year against +21.78% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.28% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +0.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.9% for RA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RA charges 2.36% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $236 vs $3 annually, a gap of $233 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RA currently yields 10.02% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RA and VOO share 32 holdings out of 738 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RA or VOO?
RA has an expense ratio of 2.36% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $233 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RA or VOO?
Over the past year RA returned +8.11% vs +23.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), RA annualized +0.80% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RA or VOO?
RA has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RA -54.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RA and VOO?
RA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RA and VOO?
RA and VOO share 32 common holdings with a 1.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 738 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RA or VOO?
RA yields 10.02% while VOO yields 1.09%, so RA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.