RADD vs VOO

RADD vs VOO

Which is better, RADD or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. RADD is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: RADD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRADDVOO
Expense Ratio0.25%0.03%Best
AUM$1.1B$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.00%1.05%
Holdings1,030519
YTD Return+0.02%+11.31%Best
1Y Return-+13.49%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.61%
Top 10 Weight35.5%Best39.1%
Fund FamilyAllianceBernstein L.P.Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 23, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

RADD vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

RADD vs VOO Performance

AB US Research Advanced ETF (RADD) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RADD is up 0.02% versus a gain of 11.31% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RADD charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RADD currently yields 0.00% against 1.05% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

RADD already in VOO88.6%
VOO already in RADD98.7%

88.6% of RADD's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 98.7% of VOO's money is in holdings RADD also owns.

Most of VOO is already inside RADD. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

484 positions in common, counted across the 1,027 positions we hold weights for in RADD and 506 in VOO, against full books of 1,030 and 519.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 16 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for RADD (1.3% of the fund), and 150 for RADD that do not appear in VOO (10.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RADDWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp.6.09%8.39%2.30%
AAPLApple, Inc5.37%7.38%2.01%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 373.87%5.78%1.91%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.34%3.71%0.63%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc., Class A1.92%3.07%1.15%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.3.26%1.41%1.85%
GOOGAlphabet, Inc., Class C2.04%2.45%0.41%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.48%2.54%1.06%
MAMastercard Inc3.00%0.68%2.32%
METAMeta Platform Inc1.25%2.43%1.18%

98.7% of VOO is already inside RADD.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

RADDVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RADD or VOO?

RADD has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between RADD and VOO?

98.7% of VOO's money is in holdings RADD also owns. 98.7% of VOO's is in holdings RADD also owns. They hold 484 positions in common, counted across the 1,027 positions we hold weights for in RADD and 506 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, RADD or VOO?

RADD yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.05%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than RADD?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. RADD is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.