RDVY vs VOO
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RDVY delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RDVY | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $24.6B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.93% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 74 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +19.04% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.24% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.07% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 6, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RDVY vs VOO Performance
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RDVY returned +31.24% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, RDVY is up 19.04% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, RDVY compounded at +21.38% per year against +21.78% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.07% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +12.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RDVY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.6% for RDVY and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RDVY charges 0.47% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RDVY currently yields 0.93% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RDVY and VOO share 64 holdings out of 512 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RDVY or VOO?
RDVY has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RDVY or VOO?
Over the past year RDVY returned +31.24% vs +23.01% for VOO, so RDVY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), RDVY annualized +12.73% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RDVY or VOO?
RDVY has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RDVY -40.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RDVY and VOO?
RDVY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RDVY and VOO?
RDVY and VOO share 64 common holdings with a 23.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 512 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RDVY or VOO?
RDVY yields 0.93% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.