RGLO vs VTI
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RGLO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGLO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 384 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.91% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.91% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Russell Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 29, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
RGLO vs VTI Performance
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) is a ETF from Russell Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGLO returned +23.91% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, RGLO is up 12.91% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 10.2% for RGLO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.6% for RGLO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGLO charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGLO currently yields 0.57% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RGLO and VTI share 96 holdings out of 3032 unique holdings combined, representing a 37.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGLO or VTI?
RGLO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RGLO or VTI?
Over the past year RGLO returned +23.91% vs +22.35% for VTI, so RGLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RGLO annualized +26.00% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RGLO or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 10.2% for RGLO. Worst drawdown: RGLO -9.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RGLO and VTI?
RGLO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RGLO and VTI?
RGLO and VTI share 96 common holdings with a 37.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3032 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGLO or VTI?
RGLO yields 0.57% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.