RGLO vs VOO
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RGLO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGLO | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 384 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.91% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.91% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Russell Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 29, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RGLO vs VOO Performance
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) is a ETF from Russell Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGLO returned +23.91% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, RGLO is up 12.91% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 10.2% for RGLO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.6% for RGLO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGLO charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGLO currently yields 0.57% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RGLO and VOO share 94 holdings out of 752 unique holdings combined, representing a 39.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGLO or VOO?
RGLO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RGLO or VOO?
Over the past year RGLO returned +23.91% vs +21.87% for VOO, so RGLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RGLO annualized +26.00% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RGLO or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 10.2% for RGLO. Worst drawdown: RGLO -9.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RGLO and VOO?
RGLO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RGLO and VOO?
RGLO and VOO share 94 common holdings with a 39.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 752 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGLO or VOO?
RGLO yields 0.57% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.