RGLO vs VOO
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RGLO or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RGLO led over 1Y, VOO over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. RGLO is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGLO | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 384 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +11.77% | +12.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.89%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2%Best | 12.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.6% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $13,135 | $13,138Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.8%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Russell Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 29, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 30, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.3 years).
RGLO vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
RGLO vs VOO Performance
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) is an ETF from Russell Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGLO returned +17.89% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, RGLO is up 11.77% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 10.2% for RGLO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.6% for RGLO and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGLO charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGLO currently yields 0.57% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
48.5% of RGLO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 60.1% of VOO's money is in holdings RGLO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
97 positions in common, counted across the 343 positions we hold weights for in RGLO and 494 in VOO, against full books of 384 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 390 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for RGLO (39.0% of the fund), and 10 for RGLO that do not appear in VOO (1.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RGLO | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.21% | 7.55% | 2.34% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.24% | 7.05% | 2.81% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.20% | 5.36% | 2.16% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.76% | 2.62% | 0.14% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.89% | 2.86% | 0.97% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.33% | 3.24% | 1.91% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.70% | 1.90% | 0.20% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 0.93% | 1.41% | 0.48% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.87% | 1.44% | 0.57% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.65% |
60.1% of VOO is already inside RGLO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGLO or VOO?
RGLO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RGLO or VOO?
Over the past year RGLO returned +17.89% vs +16.61% for VOO, so RGLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RGLO annualized +23.34% vs +23.36% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RGLO or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 10.2% for RGLO. Worst drawdown: RGLO -9.6% vs VOO -8.9%.
Should I hold both RGLO and VOO?
RGLO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RGLO and VOO?
60.1% of VOO's money is in holdings RGLO also owns. 60.1% of VOO's is in holdings RGLO also owns. They hold 97 positions in common, counted across the 343 positions we hold weights for in RGLO and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGLO or VOO?
RGLO yields 0.57% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RGLO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RGLO led over 1Y, VOO over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. RGLO is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.