ROCQ vs VOO

ROCQ vs VOO

Which is better, ROCQ or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.0%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricROCQVOO
Expense Ratio0.35%0.03%Best
AUM$526M$997.4B
Dividend Yield4.32%1.04%
Holdings103509
YTD Return+19.70%Best+14.14%
1Y Return-+17.31%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.16%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.85%
Top 10 Weight53.0%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 18, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ROCQ vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ROCQ vs VOO Performance

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ROCQ is up 19.70% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ROCQ charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROCQ currently yields 4.32% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

ROCQ already in VOO92.5%
VOO already in ROCQ53.2%

92.5% of ROCQ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 53.2% of VOO's money is in holdings ROCQ also owns.

Most of ROCQ is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

80 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in ROCQ and 494 in VOO, against full books of 103 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 407 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ROCQ (45.9% of the fund), and 12 for ROCQ that do not appear in VOO (5.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ROCQWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp9.18%7.55%1.63%
AAPLApple, Inc7.68%7.05%0.63%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.81%5.36%1.45%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.89%4.13%0.76%
GOOGAlphabet Inc5.94%2.62%3.32%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.5.53%1.44%4.09%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.89%2.86%0.03%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.82%1.21%2.61%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.97%1.90%1.07%
WMTWalmart, Inc.3.26%0.76%2.50%

92.5% of ROCQ is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ROCQVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ROCQ or VOO?

ROCQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ROCQ and VOO?

92.5% of ROCQ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 53.2% of VOO's is in holdings ROCQ also owns. They hold 80 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in ROCQ and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, ROCQ or VOO?

ROCQ yields 4.32% while VOO yields 1.04%, so ROCQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than ROCQ?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.