RSP vs VT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF vs Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
Which is better, RSP or VT?
Nearly the same fund. VT costs less.
VT has a lower expense ratio. RSP led over the full window, VT over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSP | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $99.6B | $97.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.46% | 1.55% |
| Holdings | 511 | 10,133 |
| YTD Return | +10.97% | +12.24%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.86% | +17.11%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.78% | +20.23%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.82% | +11.20%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 16.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -52.5% | -50.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,260 | $17,003Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 24, 2003 | Jun 24, 2008 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2008 to Sep 18, 2026 (18.2 years).
RSP vs VT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.2 years both funds cover.
RSP vs VT Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSP returned +13.86% while VT returned +17.11%. Year to date, RSP is up 10.97% versus a gain of 12.24% for VT.
Over three years, RSP compounded at +14.78% per year against +20.23% for VT; over five years the annualized figures are +8.82% and +11.20% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, RSP has the edge at +9.82% annualized vs +7.22%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 16.6% for VT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.5% for RSP and -50.6% for VT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSP charges 0.20% per year while VT charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $6 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSP currently yields 1.46% against 1.55% for VT.
Holdings Overlap
At least 93.9% of RSP's money is in holdings VT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VT, our book for it covers 90.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of RSP is already inside VT. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
472 positions in common, counted across the 502 positions we hold weights for in RSP and 9,272 in VT, against full books of 511 and 10,133.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSP | Weight in VT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.21% | 4.03% | 3.82% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.20% | 3.84% | 3.64% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 0.24% | 2.97% | 2.73% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.21% | 2.27% | 2.06% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 0.08% | 1.82% | 1.74% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.19% | 1.56% | 1.37% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.19% | 1.05% | 0.86% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.22% | 0.81% | 0.59% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.20% | 0.80% | 0.60% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 0.19% | 0.79% | 0.60% |
93.9% of RSP is already inside VT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSP or VT?
RSP has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VT charges 0.06%. VT is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSP or VT?
Over the past year RSP returned +13.86% vs +17.11% for VT, so VT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), RSP annualized +9.82% vs +7.22% for VT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSP or VT?
RSP has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 16.6% for VT. Worst drawdown: RSP -52.5% vs VT -50.6%.
Should I hold both RSP and VT?
RSP and VT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSP and VT?
At least 93.9% of RSP's money is in holdings VT also owns. Our book for VT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 472 positions in common, counted across the 502 positions we hold weights for in RSP and 9,272 in VT.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSP or VT?
RSP yields 1.46% while VT yields 1.55%, so VT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VT better than RSP?
VT has a lower expense ratio. RSP led over the full window, VT over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.