RSP vs VT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF vs Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VT has a lower expense ratio. VT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VT offers more diversification with 8927 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSP | VT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $97.4B | $77.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.51% | 1.61% | |
| Holdings | 510 | 10,133 | |
| YTD Return | +15.12% | +13.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.62% | +24.60% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.08% | +20.52% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.08% | +11.09% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 16.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.9% | -50.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 24, 2003 | Jun 24, 2008 |
RSP vs VT Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSP returned +22.62% while VT returned +24.60%. Year to date, RSP is up 15.12% versus a gain of 13.96% for VT.
Over three years, RSP compounded at +15.08% per year against +20.52% for VT; over five years the annualized figures are +9.08% and +11.09% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, RSP has the edge at +10.10% annualized vs +7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 16.5% for RSP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.9% for RSP and -50.6% for VT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSP charges 0.20% per year while VT charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $6 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSP currently yields 1.51% against 1.61% for VT.
Holdings Overlap
RSP and VT share 405 holdings out of 8955 unique holdings combined, representing a 24.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSP or VT?
RSP has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VT charges 0.06%. VT is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSP or VT?
Over the past year RSP returned +22.62% vs +24.60% for VT, so VT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), RSP annualized +10.10% vs +7.35% for VT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSP or VT?
VT has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 16.5% for RSP. Worst drawdown: RSP -60.9% vs VT -50.6%.
Should I hold both RSP and VT?
RSP and VT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RSP and VT?
RSP and VT share 405 common holdings with a 24.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8955 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSP or VT?
RSP yields 1.51% while VT yields 1.61%, so VT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.