RSP vs VV
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF vs Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
VV has a lower expense ratio. RSP delivered stronger 1-year returns. RSP offers more diversification with 433 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSP | VV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $97.4B | $52.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.51% | 1.25% | |
| Holdings | 510 | 446 | |
| YTD Return | +15.37% | +13.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.88% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.20% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.99% | +12.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 14.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.9% | -56.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 24, 2003 | Jan 27, 2004 |
RSP vs VV Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSP returned +22.88% while VV returned +22.17%. Year to date, RSP is up 15.37% versus a gain of 13.23% for VV.
Over three years, RSP compounded at +15.20% per year against +21.70% for VV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.99% and +12.84% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, RSP has the edge at +10.11% annualized vs +9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.8% for VV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.9% for RSP and -56.0% for VV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSP charges 0.20% per year while VV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSP currently yields 1.51% against 1.25% for VV.
Holdings Overlap
RSP and VV share 333 holdings out of 531 unique holdings combined, representing a 35.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSP or VV?
RSP has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VV charges 0.03%. VV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSP or VV?
Over the past year RSP returned +22.88% vs +22.17% for VV, so RSP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), RSP annualized +10.11% vs +9.51% for VV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSP or VV?
RSP has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.8% for VV. Worst drawdown: RSP -60.9% vs VV -56.0%.
Should I hold both RSP and VV?
RSP and VV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RSP and VV?
RSP and VV share 333 common holdings with a 35.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 531 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSP or VV?
RSP yields 1.51% while VV yields 1.25%, so RSP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.