SCD vs VTI
LMP Capital and Income Fund Inc. vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.67% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $397M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.33% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 158 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.59% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.28% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.52% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.26% | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -71.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2004 | May 24, 2001 |
SCD vs VTI Performance
LMP Capital and Income Fund Inc. (SCD) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCD returned +13.28% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, SCD is up 10.59% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Over three years, SCD compounded at +17.52% per year against +21.43% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.26% and +12.33% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +1.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -71.3% for SCD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCD charges 2.67% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $267 vs $3 annually, a gap of $264 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCD currently yields 8.33% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SCD and VTI share 56 holdings out of 2866 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCD or VTI?
SCD has an expense ratio of 2.67% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $264 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCD or VTI?
Over the past year SCD returned +13.28% vs +23.62% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), SCD annualized +1.17% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCD or VTI?
SCD has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SCD -71.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SCD and VTI?
SCD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCD and VTI?
SCD and VTI share 56 common holdings with a 23.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2866 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCD or VTI?
SCD yields 8.33% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SCD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.