SCHK vs VONE
Schwab 1000 Index ETF vs Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
Which is better, SCHK or VONE?
Nearly the same fund. SCHK costs less.
SCHK has a lower expense ratio. SCHK led over 3Y, VONE over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. SCHK is less concentrated, with 35.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHK | VONE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.06% |
| AUM | $5.5B | $8.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 1.01% |
| Holdings | 2,005 | 1,036 |
| YTD Return | +12.01%Best | +11.94% |
| 1Y Return | +12.42% | +12.43%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.44%Best | +21.40% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.16% | +11.24%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4%Tie | 16.4%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -34.8% | -34.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,972 | $17,034Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.9%Best | 36.0% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 11, 2017 | Sep 20, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 11, 2017 to Nov 11, 2026 (9.1 years).
SCHK vs VONE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.1 years both funds cover.
SCHK vs VONE Performance
Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCHK returned +12.42% while VONE returned +12.43%. Year to date, SCHK is up 12.01% versus a gain of 11.94% for VONE.
Over three years, SCHK compounded at +21.44% per year against +21.40% for VONE; over five years the annualized figures are +11.16% and +11.24% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VONE has the edge at +13.54% annualized vs +13.44%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHK and VONE have been equally volatile, both at 16.4% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.8% for SCHK and -34.7% for VONE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHK charges 0.03% per year while VONE charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHK currently yields 1.03% against 1.01% for VONE.
Holdings Overlap
97.9% of SCHK's money is in holdings VONE also owns. 97.8% of VONE's money is in holdings SCHK also owns.
Most of SCHK is already inside VONE. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
866 positions in common, counted across the 996 positions we hold weights for in SCHK and 1,022 in VONE, against full books of 2,005 and 1,036.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 76 positions for VONE that do not appear in our book for SCHK (1.6% of the fund), and 113 for SCHK that do not appear in VONE (1.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCHK | Weight in VONE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.43% | 7.54% | 0.11% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 6.94% | 6.81% | 0.13% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.50% | 5.39% | 0.11% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.46% | 3.42% | 0.04% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.83% | 2.84% | 0.01% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.29% | 2.31% | 0.02% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.27% | 2.29% | 0.02% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.26% | 2.26% | 0.00% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.43% | 1.70% | 0.27% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.44% | 1.47% | 0.03% |
97.9% of SCHK is already inside VONE.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHK or VONE?
SCHK has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VONE charges 0.06%. SCHK is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHK or VONE?
Over the past year SCHK returned +12.42% vs +12.43% for VONE, so VONE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), SCHK annualized +13.44% vs +13.54% for VONE. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHK or VONE?
SCHK and VONE have been equally volatile, both at 16.4% annualized. Worst drawdown: SCHK -34.8% vs VONE -34.7%.
Should I hold both SCHK and VONE?
SCHK and VONE have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHK and VONE?
97.9% of SCHK's money is in holdings VONE also owns. 97.8% of VONE's is in holdings SCHK also owns. They hold 866 positions in common, counted across the 996 positions we hold weights for in SCHK and 1,022 in VONE.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHK or VONE?
SCHK yields 1.03% while VONE yields 1.01%, so SCHK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VONE better than SCHK?
SCHK has a lower expense ratio. SCHK led over 3Y, VONE over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. SCHK is less concentrated, with 35.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.