SEIM vs VOO
SEI QiM US Large Cap Momentum Active ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SEIM or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SEIM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. SEIM is less concentrated, with 35.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SEIM | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.5B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 75 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +16.47%Best | +14.14% |
| 1Y Return | +19.94%Best | +17.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.60%Best | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.63% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.9% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.2% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $22,130Best | $20,847 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.1%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 18, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 18, 2022 to Sep 22, 2026 (4.3 years).
SEIM vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.
SEIM vs VOO Performance
SEI QiM US Large Cap Momentum Active ETF (SEIM) is an ETF from SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SEIM returned +19.94% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, SEIM is up 16.47% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Over three years, SEIM compounded at +29.60% per year against +23.04% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, SEIM has the edge at +20.29% annualized vs +18.63%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SEIM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 15.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.2% for SEIM and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SEIM charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SEIM currently yields 0.42% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
84.2% of SEIM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 42.4% of VOO's money is in holdings SEIM also owns.
Most of SEIM is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
55 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in SEIM and 494 in VOO, against full books of 75 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 432 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SEIM (56.7% of the fund), and 18 for SEIM that do not appear in VOO (12.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SEIM | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.27% | 7.55% | 1.28% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.32% | 7.05% | 3.73% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 5.95% | 3.24% | 2.71% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.85% | 5.36% | 2.51% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.20% | 4.13% | 2.93% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 3.28% | 0.93% | 2.35% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.58% | 1.44% | 1.14% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.72% | 0.96% | 1.76% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 2.81% | 0.57% | 2.24% |
| BKBank Of New York Mellon Corp | 2.85% | 0.17% | 2.68% |
84.2% of SEIM is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SEIM or VOO?
SEIM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SEIM or VOO?
Over the past year SEIM returned +19.94% vs +17.31% for VOO, so SEIM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SEIM annualized +20.29% vs +18.63% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SEIM or VOO?
SEIM has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 15.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SEIM -22.2% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both SEIM and VOO?
SEIM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SEIM and VOO?
84.2% of SEIM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 42.4% of VOO's is in holdings SEIM also owns. They hold 55 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in SEIM and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SEIM or VOO?
SEIM yields 0.42% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SEIM?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SEIM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. SEIM is less concentrated, with 35.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.