SPTM vs VOO
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
SPTM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPTM offers more diversification with 1,515 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPTM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $14.1B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 1,515 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +13.08% | +12.76% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.16% | +20.14% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.02% | +21.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.58% | +13.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 4, 2000 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SPTM vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SPTM returned +20.16% while VOO returned +20.14%. Year to date, SPTM is up 13.08% versus a gain of 12.76% for VOO.
Over three years, SPTM compounded at +21.02% per year against +21.69% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.58% and +13.00% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPTM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for SPTM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPTM charges 0.03% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, SPTM currently yields 1.06% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SPTM and VOO share 496 holdings out of 1516 unique holdings combined, representing a 91.0% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPTM or VOO?
SPTM has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VOO charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SPTM or VOO?
Over the past year SPTM returned +20.16% vs +20.14% for VOO, so SPTM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), SPTM annualized +12.35% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SPTM or VOO?
SPTM has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SPTM -35.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SPTM and VOO?
SPTM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between SPTM and VOO?
SPTM and VOO share 496 common holdings with a 91.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPTM or VOO?
SPTM yields 1.06% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.