STXD vs VTI
Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, STXD or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | STXD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $66M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.11% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 181 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +3.62% | +11.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.20% | +15.41%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.66% | +20.48%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.1%Best | 13.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.9%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.8 years | $15,687 | $19,380Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.8% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Strive Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 11, 2022 to Sep 16, 2026 (3.8 years).
STXD vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.8 years both funds cover.
STXD vs VTI Performance
Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF (STXD) is an ETF from Strive Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year STXD returned +6.20% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, STXD is up 3.62% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Over three years, STXD compounded at +13.66% per year against +20.48% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +19.02% annualized vs +12.58%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.4% compared with 11.1% for STXD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.9% for STXD and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
STXD charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, STXD currently yields 1.11% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.8% of STXD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 26.3% of VTI's money is in holdings STXD also owns.
Most of STXD is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
173 positions in common, counted across the 180 positions we hold weights for in STXD and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 181 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 983 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for STXD (71.2% of the fund), and 5 for STXD that do not appear in VTI (1.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in STXD | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.77% | 4.79% | 1.98% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.63% | 2.56% | 2.07% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 5.27% | 1.31% | 3.96% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 5.14% | 1.35% | 3.79% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.15% | 0.83% | 3.32% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.98% | 0.63% | 2.35% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 2.76% | 0.59% | 2.17% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 2.49% | 0.51% | 1.98% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.40% | 0.56% | 1.84% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 2.16% | 0.46% | 1.70% |
98.8% of STXD is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, STXD or VTI?
STXD has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, STXD or VTI?
Over the past year STXD returned +6.20% vs +15.41% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), STXD annualized +12.58% vs +19.02% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, STXD or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 13.4% annualized versus 11.1% for STXD. Worst drawdown: STXD -14.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both STXD and VTI?
STXD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between STXD and VTI?
98.8% of STXD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 26.3% of VTI's is in holdings STXD also owns. They hold 173 positions in common, counted across the 180 positions we hold weights for in STXD and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, STXD or VTI?
STXD yields 1.11% while VTI yields 1.03%, so STXD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than STXD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.