STXF vs VTI
Strive 500 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, STXF or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. STXF led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | STXF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.2B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.15% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 512 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.55%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +16.47%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55%Best | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3%Best | 13.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.0%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 4 years | $20,937Best | $20,386 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Strive Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4 years).
STXF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.
STXF vs VTI Performance
Strive 500 ETF (STXF) is an ETF from Strive Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year STXF returned +16.47% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, STXF is up 12.55% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, STXF compounded at +21.55% per year against +21.01% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, STXF has the edge at +20.29% annualized vs +19.49%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 13.3% for STXF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.0% for STXF and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
STXF charges 0.05% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, STXF currently yields 1.15% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.8% of STXF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 88.7% of VTI's money is in holdings STXF also owns.
Most of STXF is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
487 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in STXF and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 512 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 673 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for STXF (9.0% of the fund), and 7 for STXF that do not appear in VTI (0.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in STXF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.81% | 6.40% | 1.41% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.92% | 6.29% | 0.63% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 4.79% | 0.90% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.81% | 3.65% | 0.16% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.97% | 2.90% | 0.07% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.61% | 2.56% | 0.05% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.37% | 2.31% | 0.06% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 1.70% | 0.20% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.86% | 1.22% | 0.64% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.62% | 1.29% | 0.33% |
98.8% of STXF is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, STXF or VTI?
STXF has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, STXF or VTI?
Over the past year STXF returned +16.47% vs +16.08% for VTI, so STXF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), STXF annualized +20.29% vs +19.49% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, STXF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 13.3% for STXF. Worst drawdown: STXF -19.0% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both STXF and VTI?
STXF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between STXF and VTI?
98.8% of STXF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 88.7% of VTI's is in holdings STXF also owns. They hold 487 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in STXF and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, STXF or VTI?
STXF yields 1.15% while VTI yields 1.03%, so STXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than STXF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. STXF led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.