TNXT vs VOO

TNXT vs VOO

Which is better, TNXT or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. TNXT is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: TNXT

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTNXTVOO
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%Best
AUM$18M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings303509
YTD Return+13.82%Best+12.50%
1Y Return-+17.58%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.95%
Top 10 Weight33.8%Best36.4%
Fund FamilyT.Rowe PriceVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 28, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

TNXT vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

TNXT vs VOO Performance

T. Rowe Price Innovation Leaders ETF (TNXT) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, TNXT is up 13.82% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TNXT charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TNXT currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

TNXT already in VOO65.5%
VOO already in TNXT55.9%

65.5% of TNXT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 55.9% of VOO's money is in holdings TNXT also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

87 positions in common, counted across the 288 positions we hold weights for in TNXT and 505 in VOO, against full books of 303 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 409 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for TNXT (43.6% of the fund), and 127 for TNXT that do not appear in VOO (18.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in TNXTWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp.7.87%7.51%0.36%
AAPLApple, Inc5.31%6.59%1.28%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 373.27%4.30%1.03%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.78%3.62%0.16%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.17%2.77%0.40%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0012.51%3.25%0.74%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.28%2.59%0.31%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.2.22%1.47%0.75%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.50%2.02%0.52%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.1.55%1.92%0.37%

65.5% of TNXT is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

TNXTVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TNXT or VOO?

TNXT has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between TNXT and VOO?

65.5% of TNXT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 55.9% of VOO's is in holdings TNXT also owns. They hold 87 positions in common, counted across the 288 positions we hold weights for in TNXT and 505 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, TNXT or VOO?

TNXT yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than TNXT?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. TNXT is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.