TUG vs VOO
STF Tactical Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, TUG or VOO?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TUG led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TUG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $33M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.94% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 104 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +20.84%Best | +13.31% |
| 1Y Return | +24.39%Best | +17.07% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.08%Best | +22.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.19% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.3% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $20,741 | $20,839Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.4% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Shelton Capital Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 18, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 20, 2022 to Sep 23, 2026 (4.3 years).
TUG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.
TUG vs VOO Performance
STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) is an ETF from Shelton Capital Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TUG returned +24.39% while VOO returned +17.07%. Year to date, TUG is up 20.84% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Over three years, TUG compounded at +24.08% per year against +22.72% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +18.62% annualized vs +18.49%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 15.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.3% for TUG and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TUG charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TUG currently yields 1.94% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
94.8% of TUG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 53.3% of VOO's money is in holdings TUG also owns.
Most of TUG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
86 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in TUG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 104 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 401 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for TUG (45.9% of the fund), and 10 for TUG that do not appear in VOO (2.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TUG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.29% | 7.55% | 1.74% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.15% | 7.05% | 1.10% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.37% | 5.36% | 1.01% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.64% | 4.13% | 0.51% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 5.63% | 1.44% | 4.19% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.36% | 3.24% | 0.12% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.88% | 2.86% | 0.02% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.08% | 2.62% | 0.46% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.65% | 1.21% | 2.44% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.33% | 1.90% | 0.43% |
94.8% of TUG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TUG or VOO?
TUG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TUG or VOO?
Over the past year TUG returned +24.39% vs +17.07% for VOO, so TUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TUG annualized +18.49% vs +18.62% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TUG or VOO?
TUG has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 15.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: TUG -22.3% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both TUG and VOO?
TUG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TUG and VOO?
94.8% of TUG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 53.3% of VOO's is in holdings TUG also owns. They hold 86 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in TUG and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, TUG or VOO?
TUG yields 1.94% while VOO yields 1.04%, so TUG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than TUG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TUG led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.