TURF vs VOO
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TURF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TURF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 347 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +15.60% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.50% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | T.Rowe Price | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
TURF vs VOO Performance
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) is a ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TURF returned +34.50% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, TURF is up 15.60% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TURF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for TURF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.04. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TURF charges 0.44% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $3 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
TURF and VOO share 0 holdings out of 667 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TURF or VOO?
TURF has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TURF or VOO?
Over the past year TURF returned +34.50% vs +21.63% for VOO, so TURF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), TURF annualized +31.22% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TURF or VOO?
TURF has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: TURF -13.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both TURF and VOO?
TURF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.04, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TURF and VOO?
TURF and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 667 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.