TURF vs VTI
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, TURF or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. TURF led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TURF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $330M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.21% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 95 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +20.22%Best | +12.28% |
| 1Y Return | +32.53%Best | +16.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $14,420Best | $12,909 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | T.Rowe Price | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 12, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.3 years).
TURF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
TURF vs VTI Performance
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TURF returned +32.53% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, TURF is up 20.22% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TURF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 11.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for TURF and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.00. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TURF charges 0.44% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $3 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TURF currently yields 1.21% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
35.6% of TURF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.2% of VTI's money is in holdings TURF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
28 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in TURF and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 95 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,129 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for TURF (95.3% of the fund), and 2 for TURF that do not appear in VTI (1.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TURF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 5.51% | 0.07% | 5.44% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 4.07% | 0.89% | 3.18% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 3.02% | 0.52% | 2.50% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 3.28% | 0.05% | 3.23% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 2.76% | 0.12% | 2.64% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 2.10% | 0.20% | 1.90% |
| TSNTyson Foods Inc. Class A | 2.11% | 0.02% | 2.09% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 1.64% | 0.02% | 1.62% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 1.61% | 0.03% | 1.58% |
| MOSMosaic Co | 1.39% | 0.01% | 1.38% |
35.6% of TURF is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TURF or VTI?
TURF has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TURF or VTI?
Over the past year TURF returned +32.53% vs +16.78% for VTI, so TURF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), TURF annualized +32.52% vs +21.70% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TURF or VTI?
TURF has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 11.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TURF -13.2% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both TURF and VTI?
TURF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.00, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TURF and VTI?
35.6% of TURF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.2% of VTI's is in holdings TURF also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in TURF and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, TURF or VTI?
TURF yields 1.21% while VTI yields 1.03%, so TURF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than TURF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. TURF led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.