TURF vs VTI
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. TURF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TURF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $318M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.33% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 347 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +23.04% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +38.91% | +20.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | T.Rowe Price | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
TURF vs VTI Performance
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) is a ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TURF returned +38.91% while VTI returned +20.82%. Year to date, TURF is up 23.04% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TURF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for TURF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TURF charges 0.44% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $3 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TURF currently yields 1.33% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
TURF and VTI share 24 holdings out of 2846 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TURF or VTI?
TURF has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TURF or VTI?
Over the past year TURF returned +38.91% vs +20.82% for VTI, so TURF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), TURF annualized +37.10% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TURF or VTI?
TURF has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TURF -13.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TURF and VTI?
TURF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TURF and VTI?
TURF and VTI share 24 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2846 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TURF or VTI?
TURF yields 1.33% while VTI yields 1.07%, so TURF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.