VOO vs VTILX

VOO vs VTILX

Which is better, VOO or VTILX?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVOOVTILX
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.07%
AUM$997.4B$141.9B
Dividend Yield1.08%4.19%
Holdings5097,415
YTD Price Return+12.06%-1.77%
1Y Price Return+18.03%-3.44%
3Y Price Return (annualized)+19.60%-0.58%
5Y Price Return (annualized)+11.17%-
Volatility (annualized)15.7%6.0%Best
Max Drawdown-25.4%-15.3%Best
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityFixed Income
StyleLarge Cap Blend-
InceptionSep 7, 2010Feb 17, 2021

Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over 4.9 years, Top 10 Weight.

A price return is not the return of a fund that pays its income out. The coupon or distribution never appears in the price, so the return rows carry no winner here. VOO currently yields 1.08% and VTILX 4.19%.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 25, 2021 to Sep 4, 2026 (4.9 years).

VOO vs VTILX Performance

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Total International Bond II Index Fund Class Institutional (VTILX) is a mutual fund from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VOO's price moved +18.03% and VTILX's -3.44%, before the income each one paid out.

Over three years, VOO compounded at +19.60% per year against -0.58% for VTILX.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 6.0% for VTILX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for VOO and -15.3% for VTILX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VOO charges 0.03% per year while VTILX charges 0.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $7 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 4.19% for VTILX.

Structure and taxes

VTILX is a mutual fund and VOO is an ETF. A mutual fund prices once a day at net asset value and may carry a purchase minimum. An ETF trades through the day at whatever the market pays for it.

In a taxable account the difference that usually matters is distributions. An ETF can meet redemptions in kind, so it rarely has to sell holdings and rarely passes a capital gain to the people who held it; a mutual fund that sells holdings to meet redemptions can distribute a realised gain at year end to everyone still in the fund, whether or not they sold anything themselves. In a tax-deferred account that difference largely disappears. Both are descriptions of how the two wrappers work, not a recommendation.

Tax-loss harvesting works on either wrapper.

Holdings Overlap

VOO already in VTILX15.6%

At least 15.6% of VOO's money is in holdings VTILX also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VTILX, our book for it covers 7.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

VOO and VTILX share little of their money.

The two holdings books were reported 242 days apart, VOO as of Jun 30, 2026 and VTILX as of Oct 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

12 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 1,459 in VTILX, against full books of 509 and 7,415.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VOOWeight in VTILXDifference
AAPLApple Inc Ord6.59%0.00%6.59%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 374.30%0.00%4.30%
JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co.1.26%0.01%1.25%
WMTWalmart, Inc.0.77%0.00%0.77%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.0.69%0.00%0.69%
PGProcter & Gamble Company0.53%0.00%0.53%
GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc.0.44%0.00%0.44%
CCitigroup, Inc.0.36%0.00%0.36%
MCDMcdonald'S Corp0.30%0.01%0.29%
MCKMckesson Corp.0.14%0.00%0.14%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of VOO and VTILX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

VOOVTILX

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VOO or VTILX?

VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTILX charges 0.07%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which is riskier, VOO or VTILX?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 6.0% for VTILX. Worst drawdown: VOO -25.4% vs VTILX -15.3%.

Should I hold both VOO and VTILX?

VOO and VTILX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between VOO and VTILX?

At least 15.6% of VOO's money is in holdings VTILX also owns. Our book for VTILX is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 1,459 in VTILX.

Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or VTILX?

VOO yields 1.08% while VTILX yields 4.19%, so VTILX currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is it better to hold VTILX or VOO in a taxable account?

VOO is an ETF and VTILX is a mutual fund. An ETF can meet redemptions in kind, so it rarely distributes a capital gain to the people holding it. A mutual fund that sells holdings to meet redemptions can pass a realised gain to every holder at year end. In a tax-deferred account that difference largely disappears. This is information, not a recommendation.

Is VTILX better than VOO?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.