VOO vs VTV
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Vanguard Value ETF
Quick Verdict
VTV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | VTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $186.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.29% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 311 | |
| YTD Return | +13.44% | +18.10% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.62% | +29.51% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +18.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | +12.32% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -61.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jan 26, 2004 |
VOO vs VTV Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VOO returned +22.62% while VTV returned +29.51%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.44% versus a gain of 18.10% for VTV.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.47% per year against +18.49% for VTV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and +12.32% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -61.3% for VTV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while VTV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 2.29% for VTV.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and VTV share 294 holdings out of 519 unique holdings combined, representing a 43.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or VTV?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTV charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or VTV?
Over the past year VOO returned +22.62% vs +29.51% for VTV, so VTV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VOO annualized +13.55% vs +7.60% for VTV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or VTV?
VTV has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs VTV -61.3%.
Should I hold both VOO and VTV?
VOO and VTV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and VTV?
VOO and VTV share 294 common holdings with a 43.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 519 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or VTV?
VOO yields 1.09% while VTV yields 2.29%, so VTV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.