VTI vs VUG

VTI vs VUG

Which is better, VTI or VUG?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

VTI led over 1Y, VUG over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.6%.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVTIVUG
Expense Ratio0.03%Tie0.03%Tie
AUM$666.9B$219.5B
Dividend Yield1.03%0.38%
Holdings3,543146
YTD Return+11.06%Best+7.68%
1Y Return+15.41%Best+10.35%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.48%+23.24%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+11.52%+11.88%Best
Volatility (annualized)15.1%Best16.5%
Max Drawdown-56.6%-51.4%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$17,249$17,529Best
Top 10 Weight33.3%Best63.6%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 24, 2001Jan 26, 2004

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 30, 2004 to Sep 16, 2026 (22.6 years).

VTI vs VUG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 22.6 years both funds cover.

VTI vs VUG Performance

Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF (VUG) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VTI returned +15.41% while VUG returned +10.35%. Year to date, VTI is up 11.06% versus a gain of 7.68% for VUG.

Over three years, VTI compounded at +20.48% per year against +23.24% for VUG; over five years the annualized figures are +11.52% and +11.88% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VUG has the edge at +11.12% annualized vs +9.21%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -51.4% for VUG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VTI charges 0.03% per year while VUG charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 0.38% for VUG.

Holdings Overlap

VTI already in VUG52.0%
VUG already in VTI99.6%

52.0% of VTI's money is in holdings VUG also owns. 99.6% of VUG's money is in holdings VTI also owns.

Most of VUG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

144 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 147 in VUG, against full books of 3,543 and 146.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 3 positions for VUG that do not appear in our book for VTI (0.3% of the fund), and 1,010 for VTI that do not appear in VUG (45.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VTIWeight in VUGDifference
NVDANvidia Corp6.40%12.81%6.41%
AAPLApple, Inc6.29%12.59%6.30%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp4.79%9.59%4.80%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.65%5.15%1.50%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A2.90%5.80%2.90%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.56%4.46%1.90%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.31%4.62%2.31%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.70%3.41%1.71%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.35%2.72%1.37%
TSLATesla Inc1.22%2.44%1.22%

99.6% of VUG is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

VTIVUG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VTI or VUG?

VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VUG charges 0.03%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, VTI or VUG?

Over the past year VTI returned +15.41% vs +10.35% for VUG, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), VTI annualized +9.21% vs +11.12% for VUG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, VTI or VUG?

VUG has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs VUG -51.4%.

Should I hold both VTI and VUG?

VTI and VUG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between VTI and VUG?

99.6% of VUG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 99.6% of VUG's is in holdings VTI also owns. They hold 144 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 147 in VUG.

Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or VUG?

VTI yields 1.03% while VUG yields 0.38%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VUG better than VTI?

VTI led over 1Y, VUG over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.