ABFL vs IVV
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ABFL delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABFL | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $521M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 56 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +16.88% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.44% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.66% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.61% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
ABFL vs IVV Performance
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) is a ETF from FCF Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ABFL returned +23.44% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, ABFL is up 16.88% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, ABFL compounded at +17.66% per year against +21.77% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.61% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, ABFL has the edge at +14.49% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for ABFL and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABFL charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABFL currently yields 0.52% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ABFL and IVV share 38 holdings out of 525 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABFL or IVV?
ABFL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABFL or IVV?
Over the past year ABFL returned +23.44% vs +23.01% for IVV, so ABFL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ABFL annualized +14.49% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABFL or IVV?
ABFL has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ABFL -35.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ABFL and IVV?
ABFL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ABFL and IVV?
ABFL and IVV share 38 common holdings with a 22.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 525 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABFL or IVV?
ABFL yields 0.52% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.