ABFL vs QQQ
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABFL | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $521M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 56 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +17.58% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.99% | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.68% | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.53% | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2016 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ABFL vs QQQ Performance
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) is a ETF from FCF Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ABFL returned +22.99% while QQQ returned +25.37%. Year to date, ABFL is up 17.58% versus a gain of 18.31% for QQQ.
Over three years, ABFL compounded at +17.68% per year against +25.79% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +11.53% and +15.20% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, ABFL has the edge at +14.55% annualized vs +13.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.9% for ABFL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for ABFL and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABFL charges 0.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $18 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABFL currently yields 0.52% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
ABFL and QQQ share 14 holdings out of 147 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABFL or QQQ?
ABFL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABFL or QQQ?
Over the past year ABFL returned +22.99% vs +25.37% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ABFL annualized +14.55% vs +13.10% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABFL or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.9% for ABFL. Worst drawdown: ABFL -35.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ABFL and QQQ?
ABFL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABFL and QQQ?
ABFL and QQQ share 14 common holdings with a 22.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 147 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABFL or QQQ?
ABFL yields 0.52% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so ABFL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.