ABFL vs VYM
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, ABFL or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ABFL led over the full window, VYM over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABFL | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $528M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.54% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 60 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +12.44%Best | +11.35% |
| 1Y Return | +11.49% | +15.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.14% | +17.22%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.84% | +12.30%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 14.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0%Best | -35.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,729 | $17,861Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.0% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 28, 2016 to Sep 18, 2026 (10 years).
ABFL vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10 years both funds cover.
ABFL vs VYM Performance
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) is an ETF from FCF Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABFL returned +11.49% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, ABFL is up 12.44% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, ABFL compounded at +16.14% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.84% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, ABFL has the edge at +13.88% annualized vs +9.99%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 14.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for ABFL and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABFL charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABFL currently yields 0.54% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
34.4% of ABFL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 16.0% of VYM's money is in holdings ABFL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
22 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in ABFL and 557 in VYM, against full books of 60 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 506 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for ABFL (81.1% of the fund), and 32 for ABFL that do not appear in VYM (61.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABFL | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.48% | 7.35% | 3.87% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.89% | 1.80% | 1.09% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.92% | 0.54% | 2.38% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 2.29% | 0.46% | 1.83% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.99% | 0.43% | 1.56% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 1.69% | 0.66% | 1.03% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 1.81% | 0.48% | 1.33% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.97% | 1.21% | 0.24% |
| TPRTapestry Inc. | 1.86% | 0.13% | 1.73% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.38% |
34.4% of ABFL is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABFL or VYM?
ABFL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABFL or VYM?
Over the past year ABFL returned +11.49% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ABFL annualized +13.88% vs +9.99% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABFL or VYM?
ABFL has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 14.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ABFL -35.0% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both ABFL and VYM?
ABFL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABFL and VYM?
34.4% of ABFL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 16.0% of VYM's is in holdings ABFL also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in ABFL and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABFL or VYM?
ABFL yields 0.54% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than ABFL?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ABFL led over the full window, VYM over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.