ABFL vs VOO
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABFL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $521M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 56 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +16.46% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.42% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.38% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.51% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ABFL vs VOO Performance
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) is a ETF from FCF Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABFL returned +22.42% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, ABFL is up 16.46% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, ABFL compounded at +17.38% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.51% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, ABFL has the edge at +14.46% annualized vs +13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for ABFL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABFL charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABFL currently yields 0.52% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ABFL and VOO share 38 holdings out of 525 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABFL or VOO?
ABFL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABFL or VOO?
Over the past year ABFL returned +22.42% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ABFL annualized +14.46% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABFL or VOO?
ABFL has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ABFL -35.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ABFL and VOO?
ABFL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ABFL and VOO?
ABFL and VOO share 38 common holdings with a 22.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 525 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABFL or VOO?
ABFL yields 0.52% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.