ABFL vs VTI
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ABFL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABFL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $521M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 56 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.83% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.38% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.44% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.44% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
ABFL vs VTI Performance
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) is a ETF from FCF Advisors and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABFL returned +23.38% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, ABFL is up 16.83% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, ABFL compounded at +17.44% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.44% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, ABFL has the edge at +14.48% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for ABFL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABFL charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABFL currently yields 0.52% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ABFL and VTI share 51 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABFL or VTI?
ABFL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABFL or VTI?
Over the past year ABFL returned +23.38% vs +23.31% for VTI, so ABFL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ABFL annualized +14.48% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABFL or VTI?
ABFL has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ABFL -35.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ABFL and VTI?
ABFL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ABFL and VTI?
ABFL and VTI share 51 common holdings with a 21.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABFL or VTI?
ABFL yields 0.52% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.