ABLD vs ECML
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
Which is better, ABLD or ECML?
ECML has been ahead.
ABLD has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | ECML |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $99M | $123M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 51 | 130 |
| YTD Return | +8.40% | +19.10%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.95% | +25.99%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.74% | +14.85%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0%Best | 18.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $14,581 | $16,241Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.5% | 20.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Euclidean Technologies |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | May 18, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 18, 2023 to Oct 12, 2026 (3.4 years).
ABLD vs ECML growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
ABLD vs ECML Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is an ETF from Euclidean Technologies. Over the past year ABLD returned +12.95% while ECML returned +25.99%. Year to date, ABLD is up 8.40% versus a gain of 19.10% for ECML.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +9.74% per year against +14.85% for ECML.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 14.0% for ABLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -25.4% for ECML. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while ECML charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $95 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.37% against 1.10% for ECML.
Holdings Overlap
19.5% of ABLD's money is in holdings ECML also owns. 12.9% of ECML's money is in holdings ABLD also owns.
ABLD and ECML share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 64 in ECML, against full books of 51 and 130.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 55 positions for ECML that do not appear in our book for ABLD (85.3% of the fund), and 24 for ABLD that do not appear in ECML (48.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABLD | Weight in ECML | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APAAPA Corp. | 4.37% | 1.74% | 2.63% |
| CQPCheniere Energy Partners Lp | 3.99% | 1.49% | 2.50% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 3.67% | 1.72% | 1.95% |
| PAGPPlains Gp Holdings Lp | 2.16% | 1.66% | 0.50% |
| ALSNAllison Transmission Holdings Inc. | 1.37% | 2.09% | 0.72% |
| HESMHess Midstream Partners Lp | 2.01% | 1.42% | 0.59% |
| CALMCal-maine Foods Inc | 1.07% | 1.38% | 0.31% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.86% | 1.36% | 0.50% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLD and ECML you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or ECML?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while ECML charges 0.95%. ABLD is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLD or ECML?
Over the past year ABLD returned +12.95% vs +25.99% for ECML, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLD or ECML?
ECML has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 14.0% for ABLD. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs ECML -25.4%.
Should I hold both ABLD and ECML?
ABLD and ECML have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLD and ECML?
19.5% of ABLD's money is in holdings ECML also owns. 12.9% of ECML's is in holdings ABLD also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 64 in ECML.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or ECML?
ABLD yields 3.37% while ECML yields 1.10%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ECML better than ABLD?
ABLD has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.