AGRW vs VOO
Allspring LT Large Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGRW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $117M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.78% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.17% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
AGRW vs VOO Performance
Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGRW returned +13.17% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, AGRW is up 7.78% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.5% for AGRW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGRW charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGRW currently yields 0.12% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
AGRW and VOO share 38 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 37.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGRW or VOO?
AGRW has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGRW or VOO?
Over the past year AGRW returned +13.17% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AGRW annualized +22.06% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGRW or VOO?
AGRW has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: AGRW -16.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AGRW and VOO?
AGRW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between AGRW and VOO?
AGRW and VOO share 38 common holdings with a 37.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGRW or VOO?
AGRW yields 0.12% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.