AOD vs TYLG
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
TYLG has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. AOD offers more diversification with 86 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | TYLG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $15M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.73% | 8.89% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 78 | |
| YTD Return | +18.25% | +20.94% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.04% | +34.81% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.83% | +23.52% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.44% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 15.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -24.5% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Nov 21, 2022 |
AOD vs TYLG Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year AOD returned +33.04% while TYLG returned +34.81%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.25% versus a gain of 20.94% for TYLG.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +23.83% per year against +23.52% for TYLG. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +25.07% annualized vs -4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 15.8% for TYLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -24.5% for TYLG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while TYLG charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $60 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.73% against 8.89% for TYLG.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and TYLG share 7 holdings out of 152 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or TYLG?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while TYLG charges 0.60%. TYLG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or TYLG?
Over the past year AOD returned +33.04% vs +34.81% for TYLG, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AOD annualized -4.03% vs +25.07% for TYLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or TYLG?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 15.8% for TYLG. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs TYLG -24.5%.
Should I hold both AOD and TYLG?
AOD and TYLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and TYLG?
AOD and TYLG share 7 common holdings with a 11.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 152 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or TYLG?
AOD yields 11.73% while TYLG yields 8.89%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.