AQLG vs QQQ

AQLG vs QQQ

Which is better, AQLG or QQQ?

QQQ costs less.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. AQLG is less concentrated, with 35.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: AQLG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAQLGQQQ
Expense Ratio0.65%0.18%Best
AUM$78M$483.5B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.44%
Holdings132107
YTD Return+4.74%+15.86%Best
1Y Return-+22.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.15%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.16%
Top 10 Weight35.6%Best46.5%
Fund FamilyHighland Capital ManagementInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJun 8, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AQLG vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

AQLG vs QQQ Performance

HCM Large Cap Growth ETF (AQLG) is an ETF from Highland Capital Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, AQLG is up 4.74% versus a gain of 15.86% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AQLG charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AQLG currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

AQLG already in QQQ33.5%
QQQ already in AQLG67.9%

33.5% of AQLG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 67.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings AQLG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

34 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in AQLG and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 132 and 107.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 61 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for AQLG (29.2% of the fund), and 88 for AQLG that do not appear in QQQ (64.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AQLGWeight in QQQDifference
AAPLApple, Inc4.99%7.27%2.28%
NVDANvidia Corp.2.89%8.44%5.55%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 372.83%5.76%2.93%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0014.67%3.36%1.31%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.72%4.67%1.95%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.39%4.43%2.04%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.25%3.16%0.09%
GOOGAlphabet Inc1.69%3.13%1.44%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.0.79%2.78%1.99%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.0.07%3.45%3.38%

67.9% of QQQ is already inside AQLG.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AQLGQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AQLG or QQQ?

AQLG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AQLG and QQQ?

67.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings AQLG also owns. 67.9% of QQQ's is in holdings AQLG also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in AQLG and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, AQLG or QQQ?

AQLG yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than AQLG?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. AQLG is less concentrated, with 35.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.