AQLG vs SPY

AQLG vs SPY

Which is better, AQLG or SPY?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. AQLG is less concentrated, with 35.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%.

Lower Fees: SPYLess Concentrated: AQLG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAQLGSPY
Expense Ratio0.65%0.09%Best
AUM$78M$804.7B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.98%
Holdings132505
YTD Return+5.05%+12.19%Best
1Y Return-+18.53%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.88%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.69%
Top 10 Weight35.6%Best38.0%
Fund FamilyHighland Capital ManagementState Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 8, 2026Jan 22, 1993

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AQLG vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

AQLG vs SPY Performance

HCM Large Cap Growth ETF (AQLG) is an ETF from Highland Capital Management and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Year to date, AQLG is up 5.05% versus a gain of 12.19% for SPY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AQLG charges 0.65% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $9 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AQLG currently yields 0.00% against 0.98% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

AQLG already in SPY70.2%
SPY already in AQLG62.8%

70.2% of AQLG's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 62.8% of SPY's money is in holdings AQLG also owns.

Most of AQLG is already inside SPY. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

84 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in AQLG and 504 in SPY, against full books of 132 and 505.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 410 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for AQLG (36.7% of the fund), and 38 for AQLG that do not appear in SPY (27.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AQLGWeight in SPYDifference
AAPLApple, Inc4.99%6.83%1.84%
NVDANvidia Corp.2.89%7.71%4.82%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 372.83%5.50%2.67%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0014.67%3.33%1.34%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.72%4.08%1.36%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.25%2.97%0.28%
GOOGAlphabet Inc1.69%2.67%0.98%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.39%1.51%0.88%
BACBank Of America Corp.3.27%0.62%2.65%
CCitigroup Inc.3.41%0.35%3.06%

70.2% of AQLG is already inside SPY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AQLGSPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AQLG or SPY?

AQLG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AQLG and SPY?

70.2% of AQLG's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 62.8% of SPY's is in holdings AQLG also owns. They hold 84 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in AQLG and 504 in SPY.

Which pays a higher dividend, AQLG or SPY?

AQLG yields 0.00% while SPY yields 0.98%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than AQLG?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. AQLG is less concentrated, with 35.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.