AQLG vs VTI
HCM Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, AQLG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AQLG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $78M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 132 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +4.74% | +11.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.72% |
| Fund Family | Highland Capital Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
AQLG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AQLG vs VTI Performance
HCM Large Cap Growth ETF (AQLG) is an ETF from Highland Capital Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, AQLG is up 4.74% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AQLG charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AQLG currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 82.2% of AQLG's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of AQLG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, AQLG as of Aug 18, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
107 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in AQLG and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 132 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AQLG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.99% | 5.84% | 0.85% |
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 2.89% | 6.32% | 3.43% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 4.67% | 2.88% | 1.79% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 2.83% | 3.81% | 0.98% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.72% | 3.17% | 0.45% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.25% | 2.46% | 0.79% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.39% | 1.79% | 0.60% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.69% | 2.27% | 0.58% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 3.27% | 0.50% | 2.77% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 3.41% | 0.32% | 3.09% |
82.2% of AQLG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AQLG or VTI?
AQLG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AQLG and VTI?
At least 82.2% of AQLG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 107 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in AQLG and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, AQLG or VTI?
AQLG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than AQLG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.