BCHP vs SPY
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCHP | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $226M | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +5.22% | +14.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.27% | +21.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.94% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Principal Funds | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 12, 2023 | Jan 22, 1993 |
BCHP vs SPY Performance
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) is a ETF from Principal Funds and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year BCHP returned +4.27% while SPY returned +21.96%. Year to date, BCHP is up 5.22% versus a gain of 14.47% for SPY.
Over three years, BCHP compounded at +15.94% per year against +21.70% for SPY. Across the full 3-year window we track, BCHP has the edge at +15.74% annualized vs +8.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCHP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.6% for BCHP and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCHP charges 0.58% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $9 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCHP currently yields 0.00% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
BCHP and SPY share 20 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 27.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCHP or SPY?
BCHP has an expense ratio of 0.58% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCHP or SPY?
Over the past year BCHP returned +4.27% vs +21.96% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BCHP annualized +15.74% vs +8.87% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCHP or SPY?
BCHP has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: BCHP -18.6% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both BCHP and SPY?
BCHP and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCHP and SPY?
BCHP and SPY share 20 common holdings with a 27.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCHP or SPY?
BCHP yields 0.00% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.