BDVG vs JGRO
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF vs JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
Which is better, BDVG or JGRO?
Each has led over a different period.
JGRO has a lower expense ratio. BDVG led over 1Y and 3Y, JGRO over the full window. BDVG is less concentrated, with 42.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BDVG | JGRO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | - | $9.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.30% | 0.16% |
| Holdings | 84 | 273 |
| YTD Return | +20.11%Best | -2.79% |
| 1Y Return | +21.86%Best | -4.85% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.55%Best | +16.91% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.9%Best | 16.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.5%Best | -22.7% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $15,899 | $16,313Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.5%Best | 51.3% |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2023 | Aug 8, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 30, 2023 to Nov 11, 2026 (3.4 years).
BDVG vs JGRO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
BDVG vs JGRO Performance
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) is an ETF from iMGP Funds and JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year BDVG returned +21.86% while JGRO returned -4.85%. Year to date, BDVG is up 20.11% versus a loss of 2.79% for JGRO.
Over three years, BDVG compounded at +18.55% per year against +16.91% for JGRO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 10.9% for BDVG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.5% for BDVG and -22.7% for JGRO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BDVG charges 0.55% per year while JGRO charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $44 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BDVG currently yields 1.30% against 0.16% for JGRO.
Holdings Overlap
41.2% of BDVG's money is in holdings JGRO also owns. 16.0% of JGRO's money is in holdings BDVG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BDVG and 136 in JGRO, against full books of 84 and 273.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 113 positions for JGRO that do not appear in our book for BDVG (82.5% of the fund), and 23 for BDVG that do not appear in JGRO (52.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BDVG | Weight in JGRO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple Inc | 4.57% | 6.12% | 1.55% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.83% | 4.82% | 0.99% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 5.58% | 0.74% | 4.84% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 4.06% | 0.27% | 3.79% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 3.54% | 0.34% | 3.20% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 2.88% | 0.45% | 2.43% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.18% | 1.13% | 1.05% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 2.66% | 0.39% | 2.27% |
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 2.04% | 0.71% | 1.33% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 1.86% | 0.53% | 1.33% |
41.2% of BDVG is already inside JGRO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BDVG or JGRO?
BDVG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while JGRO charges 0.44%. JGRO is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BDVG or JGRO?
Over the past year BDVG returned +21.86% vs -4.85% for JGRO, so BDVG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BDVG or JGRO?
JGRO has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 10.9% for BDVG. Worst drawdown: BDVG -14.5% vs JGRO -22.7%.
Should I hold both BDVG and JGRO?
BDVG and JGRO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BDVG and JGRO?
41.2% of BDVG's money is in holdings JGRO also owns. 16.0% of JGRO's is in holdings BDVG also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BDVG and 136 in JGRO.
Which pays a higher dividend, BDVG or JGRO?
BDVG yields 1.30% while JGRO yields 0.16%, so BDVG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JGRO better than BDVG?
JGRO has a lower expense ratio. BDVG led over 1Y and 3Y, JGRO over the full window. BDVG is less concentrated, with 42.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.