BUYZ vs VOO
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUYZ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -5.87% | +12.73% | |
| 1Y Return | -12.27% | +20.59% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.31% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.68% | +12.87% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 25, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BUYZ vs VOO Performance
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BUYZ returned -12.27% while VOO returned +20.59%. Year to date, BUYZ is down 5.87% versus a gain of 12.73% for VOO.
Over three years, BUYZ compounded at +14.31% per year against +21.70% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -6.68% and +12.87% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +6.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUYZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.0% for BUYZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUYZ charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUYZ currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BUYZ and VOO share 21 holdings out of 543 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUYZ or VOO?
BUYZ has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BUYZ or VOO?
Over the past year BUYZ returned -12.27% vs +20.59% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BUYZ annualized +6.78% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BUYZ or VOO?
BUYZ has been the more volatile fund at 28.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BUYZ -68.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BUYZ and VOO?
BUYZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BUYZ and VOO?
BUYZ and VOO share 21 common holdings with a 13.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 543 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUYZ or VOO?
BUYZ yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.