CGGR vs QQQ
Capital Group Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. CGGR offers more diversification with 211 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $25.1B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.16% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 211 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +5.56% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.73% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.96% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CGGR vs QQQ Performance
Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CGGR returned +13.73% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, CGGR is up 5.56% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, CGGR compounded at +23.96% per year against +25.96% for QQQ. Across the full 5-year window we track, CGGR has the edge at +15.90% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.6% for CGGR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.9% for CGGR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGR charges 0.39% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $18 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGR currently yields 0.16% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CGGR and QQQ share 31 holdings out of 169 unique holdings combined, representing a 42.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGR or QQQ?
CGGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGGR or QQQ?
Over the past year CGGR returned +13.73% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CGGR annualized +15.90% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGGR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.6% for CGGR. Worst drawdown: CGGR -28.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CGGR and QQQ?
CGGR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGR and QQQ?
CGGR and QQQ share 31 common holdings with a 42.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 169 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGR or QQQ?
CGGR yields 0.16% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.